Next.js vs WordPress for a SaaS Marketing Site
WordPress runs 40% of the web and is still the wrong default for SaaS. But not for the reasons most developers give — and there are cases where it's clearly the better call.
This debate is usually argued on taste. Here's the version that matters to a founder deciding where the marketing site lives.
Speed, and why it's a revenue issue
A Next.js marketing page is pre-rendered to static HTML and served from a CDN edge near the visitor. A typical WordPress page is assembled per request by PHP hitting MySQL, then patched up with a caching plugin.
Well-tuned WordPress can be fast. The problem is that it rarely stays fast: every plugin adds CSS and JavaScript to the critical path, and a year of small additions quietly doubles your load time. Static output doesn't drift like that.
This matters because Core Web Vitals influence rankings, and because paid traffic is expensive — if a tenth of your ad clicks bounce before the hero renders, you're funding your competitors' auction prices.
SEO: a closer race than developers admit
WordPress with Yoast or RankMath gives a non-technical marketer excellent SEO tooling: redirects, meta editing, schema, readability prompts, all without a developer. That's a genuine advantage and it's why WordPress is still everywhere.
Next.js gives you the same capabilities through code — per-page metadata, generated sitemaps, canonicals, structured data, image optimisation — which is cleaner and faster but requires a developer for anything structural. If nobody on your team writes code, that's a real operational cost.
| Next.js | WordPress | |
|---|---|---|
| Page speed | Excellent by default | Good with work, degrades over time |
| Content editing | Needs a CMS added | Built in, familiar to everyone |
| Technical SEO | Full control, in code | Excellent via plugins |
| Security patching | Minimal surface | Ongoing obligation |
| Hosting | $0 – $20/mo | $15 – $200/mo |
| Shares code with your app | Yes | No |
| Dev cost for changes | Developer needed | Often self-serve |
The argument that actually decides it for SaaS
Your product is almost certainly React. If your marketing site is also React, then your design system, components, types and tooling are shared — a button restyle applies everywhere, and the login page doesn't look like it belongs to a different company.
With WordPress you maintain two stacks, two deploy pipelines and two design implementations that drift apart every quarter. For a small team that's a meaningful ongoing tax, and it's the most honest reason to pick Next.js for SaaS specifically.
When WordPress is the right call
- No developer on the team and no budget for one on retainer.
- A marketer who must publish and restructure pages daily without waiting on anyone.
- A content-heavy operation — hundreds of posts, multiple authors, editorial workflow already established.
- You need membership, forums or e-commerce tomorrow and a plugin solves it today.
Those are good reasons, not compromises. A fast WordPress site that your team can actually update beats an elegant Next.js site nobody can edit.
What a migration really involves
- 1Export every URL from Search Console, sorted by clicks.
- 2Map old URLs to new ones and write the 301 redirects before launch, not after.
- 3Move content into the new CMS, preserving titles, meta descriptions and canonical tags.
- 4Keep image filenames and alt text — image search traffic is easy to lose and hard to notice.
- 5Launch, then re-crawl and check for 404s and redirect chains in the first week.
Done properly, rankings dip for a week or two and recover. Done carelessly, you lose traffic that took years to build, and the cause is almost always missing redirects.
Frequently asked
Is Next.js good for SEO?
Yes. Server-rendered and statically generated HTML is exactly what crawlers want, and the framework handles metadata, sitemaps and canonicals natively. The caveat is purely operational: structural SEO changes need a developer, where WordPress lets a marketer do it alone.
Can I keep my WordPress blog and build the rest in Next.js?
Yes — run WordPress headless and pull posts into Next.js via its REST or GraphQL API. Your writers keep the editor they know, visitors get static pages. It's a common and sensible arrangement.
How much does a Next.js SaaS marketing site cost?
Roughly $2,000 to $3,500 for a single strong landing page, and $4,500 to $7,000 for a full marketing site with home, features, pricing and a blog. Adding a headless CMS typically costs $800 to $2,000 more, plus any CMS subscription.